Few clicks database Web API? The biggest advantage of a Restful API is that you don’t have to install anything on the client side (i.e. Your app for example). No SDKs or frameworks are needed nor required. All you have to do is to make a simple HTTP request to the target API service, let the server do the precessing for you and get the result back. Suppose for example, you wanna build a Snapchat clone app. You need for that an image/video processing library, an augmented reality toolkit and an SDK for facial feature extraction. As you may notice, this is time consuming and require a lot of work integrating all the complex libraries into you program.
SOAP’s standard HTTP protocol makes it easier for it to operate across firewalls and proxies without modifications to the SOAP protocol itself. But because it uses the complex XML format, it tends to be slower compared to middleware such as ICE and COBRA. Additionally, while it’s rarely needed, some use cases require greater transactional reliability than what can be achieved with HTTP (which limits REST in this capacity). If you need ACID-compliant transactions, SOAP is the way to go. In some cases, designing SOAP services can actually be less complex compared to REST. For web services that support complex operations, requiring content and context to be maintained, designing a SOAP service requires less coding in the application layer for transactions, security, trust, and other elements.
Hide Internal Codes: Needless to say, this is an implementation detail that gives away that we are using a relational database, and experienced Oracle users would instantly spot that it’s Oracle’s sample HR schema. This leaking makes it harder to switch to a document-oriented database, like MongoDB, where there is no concept of foreign keys. But even if the chance of switching to MongoDB is zero, it still makes the response harder to read. So a better approach is to let the REST API translate the internal code to the human-readable value that the code represents (i.e. “Shipping Clerk”) and then also remove the Id part of the field name. This version is definitely more readable, but a fair concern is if the service will be slower now that it needs to lookup the value? I used to be an avid reader of Tom Kyte, the Oracle DB expert, and still remember that you should always optimize from measurements. I mean there’s a good chance that the HTTP cache will help us out and make it less of a bottleneck than it appears at first glance. As a rule of thumb, if performance means everything to you (or you have a lot of lookup fields) then you might consider leaking the internal codes. Otherwise, you should provide a more readable API by hiding them.
When I ran InstantWebAPI I get an error message about writing rights. How can this be fixed? If you created the stub solution as an administrator, then InstantWebAPI needs to be run as an administrator as well. We have a database with 80 tables. How many tables and views can this software generate the code for? This code was tested against databases with more than 100 tables. Web API project code gets generated pretty fast, but generating Unit Test code it might take a while. We recommend generating the code for a limited number of tables at a time. We have a database with multiple schema. Can the code be generated for all the schemas at the same time? No, this version of the software only allows generating the code for one schema at a time. Further customization can be added by sending a requests to Customer Service. Read extra info on http://instantwebapi.com/.